I apologise for not providing more entertainment for sometime. I hoped to be able to write the finale in the form of a court order to the jokers of ASPA(Vic) committee, but it looks like this will require some more time.
One reason is that my former barrister was a lazy old
withered brilliant lawman. To him time was irrelevant. It took him more than a
year to produce a letter of demand. He could have taken a couple more years to
file the court case. So, I decided to give him the flick, in favour of a Catholic
young barrister, with no suspicion of any conflict of interest, since Catholics
are definitely not the chosen ones.
Another interesting development is that a reputable national
current affairs “Monthly” has shown interest in the incompetence of Carol et
al. I will see what I can do for them, without bringing Victorian scrabble into
much disrepute. Here is their email:
From: Michael Lucy michaell@themonthly.com.au
Subject:
Scrabble case enquiry
1 Nov 2013
Dear Mr Hegazi,
My name is Michael Lucy, of the Monthly magazine. We are a national current affairs magazine.
I am interested in writing an article on your ongoing dispute with the Australian Scrabble Players Association (Victoria). The story as I have read about it on your blog is fascinating, and I believe it deserves a wider audience.
Would you have time to discuss the story at any point in the next week or so?
Kind regards,
My name is Michael Lucy, of the Monthly magazine. We are a national current affairs magazine.
I am interested in writing an article on your ongoing dispute with the Australian Scrabble Players Association (Victoria). The story as I have read about it on your blog is fascinating, and I believe it deserves a wider audience.
Would you have time to discuss the story at any point in the next week or so?
Kind regards,
--
Michael Lucy
Deputy Editor
The MonthlyDeputy Editor
37-39 Langridge Street
Collingwood
Victoria 3066
Australia
No comments:
Post a Comment