Total Pageviews

In an effort to internationalise the game, a group of nutcases periodically revise the allowed vocabulary. Scrabble vocabulary developed into a bizarre jargon claimed to cover words from other languages. If you only play with friends, use any dictionary without the word "Scrabble" on its cover. This blog is primarily concerned with competitive Scrabble and the incompetence of some of its custodians..

Thursday, July 2, 2015

THE SOLUTION: NEW REFINED SCRABBLE ASSOCIATION

We all invested many years playing Scrabble. We put up with much commercial exploitation in the form of periodic additions and deletions to approved vocabulary. Vocabulary itself deteriorated with the addition of foreign words, abbreviations, acronyms and colloquial nonsense.

The last straw was the introduction of a new three-year dictionary change cycle, instead of the five-year cycle, which we unwillingly tolerated. It is obvious that the change is commercially motivated.

The solution is simple. We need to register a new incorporated association, something like “Proper English Scrabble Association Inc.”. All we need is a minimum of six founding members, to be picked from among players who are sick of the current state of affairs. I can look after the registration process.

The aim is to adopt a new dictionary, to be permanent for at least 5 or 10 years. An initial idea is to adopt a scrabble form of the Oxford or Cambridge dictionaries.

We need to produce our own adjudication programme for quick checking purposes. For this reason, we require at least one enthusiastic member with the required technological skill. We also need to examine and avoid copyright issues.

Should you be interested please email me, as an initial contact. Your identity would remain confidential, if you wish:



If the idea appeals to sufficient numbers, we would have our initial general meeting shortly after. We can then say goodbye to incompetence.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I like the general idea, if only for freeing us from commercial shackles. But wouldn't be easier to clean up the lexicon of CSW15 rather than start from scratch?

Mohammed A. Hegazi said...

Yours is a brilliant idea. I initially had a look at the Oxford, only to find out that it is in 20 volumes, selling at over a thousand dollars.

After reading your message, I trialled deleting entries from the Zyzzyva lexicon and found it very easy to do, but the volume of work would be hard for one person. It would be easier to break up the lexicon into say 20 pieces, for 20 people to work on. Deleted entries would be kept in separate files, for approval by a committee.

Please keep your responses to this post confined to my private email (mohammedhegazi@gmail.com). If we have sufficient numbers, we would use an emailing list of all interested people. An exchange of ideas would galvanise the project.