If you are a sane person playing competitive scrabble, you
would have realised by now that you managed to survive in a madhouse. If you are an
active nut in that house, you would also be parading your stupidity on the so called “social
media”. This post is for the benefit of some clowns on “Facebook”.
Total Pageviews
In an effort to internationalise the game, a group of nutcases periodically revise the allowed vocabulary. Scrabble vocabulary developed into a bizarre jargon claimed to cover words from other languages. If you only play with friends, use any dictionary without the word "Scrabble" on its cover. This blog is primarily concerned with competitive Scrabble and the incompetence of some of its custodians..
Tuesday, January 19, 2016
Thursday, December 3, 2015
IDIOTS GALORE
At a recent tournament in QLD, I had an idiot (RC) facing me for game three. She said at the beginning of the game, “I will
keep an eye on you because you are a cheat”. It goes without saying that the
super nut received an adequate response to her slanderous garbage.
I was told by several other friendly players that the woman in question was a
mental case, but that did not stop me wondering for the remainder of the day.
Tuesday, November 17, 2015
FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE AGM OF ASPA(VIC) ON 22/11/2015
For those
who could not figure out why ASPA (Vic) paid $1567 in legal fees as per their financial statement of 2015:
(1) In 2008 a committee
of ASPA (Vic) took a wrong disciplinary decision against Mohammed Hegazi.
Members of that committee included, among others, Carol Johnsen, Marj Miller,
Norma Fisher and Trevor Halsall.
(2) In 2011 an
internal review by Carol Johnsen and Norma Fisher not only refused to annul the wrong
disciplinary decision of 2008, but also denied other uninvolved members of the committee the chance of participation in the review process.
(3) In 2012 an ASPA
(Vic) delegation comprised of Carol Johnsen, Marj miller and Trevor halsall vs
Mohammed Hegazi and Harry Malcolm attended a meeting at the Dispute Settlement
Centre of Victoria, Department of Justice. The delegation refused to annul the
wrong disciplinary decision of 2008. The basic argument raised by Trevor
Halsall at the meeting was that Mohammed Hegazi had cheated at scrabble
tournaments. Such argument was later proven false. Its sole perpetrator (KR) was proven a liar by the tournament director (Geoff Wright).
(4) In 2015 a
magistrate issued an order nullifying the disciplinary decision of 2008, based on an agreement by ASPA(Vic) that such decision was wrong.
(5) Had the dispute
been settled the same way at the Dispute Settlement Centre in 2012, the cost to all parties would
have been $00,000.00
(6) The incompetent parties are still seeking positions on a new Committee. I wish ASPA (Vic) a merry Christmas and a happy 2016 new year.
Friday, October 16, 2015
SIMPLY AMAZING
I had the honour of facing
the chief of the National Rule’s custodians in a recent tournament. I was both amazed
and amused when he committed a couple of ‘rule crimes’, namely:
(a)
While replenishing his rack, he held tiles in one hand and stuck the
other hand into the bag in order to collect the remainder of the needed tiles.
(b)
Playing another variation on the theme of how to hold the bag, he held
the bag at arm's length, below the level of the table, while looking away from
the bag.
There has been a myth propagated
by his Victorian rules’ counterpart, that I am always willy nilly accusing other people of
cheating , if not cheating myself. So in order to dispel this myth, I hasten to
add that the guy had no intention whatsoever to cheat. I am only wondering why he does not practice
what he preaches, by following the letter of the rules. I thought he might have
been trying to tease me. So, I responded at the time by holding the bag above my head while
replenishing my rack. That’ll learn ya!
Sunday, October 4, 2015
MORE ABOUT SCRABBLE RULES AND RULES OFFICERS
I did elaborate on the
funny “hold” rule (National Rule 10.2) and how it should be eliminated without
much ado. I also discussed handling the tile bag (National Rule 5.1) and how
the height of its rim should be related to the eyes of the player, rather than
to the table top, since tables are not all born with equal heights. The silly
wording of this rule is creating problems and needless acrimony between
players. I have been repeating myself in vain for almost a decade. ASPA’s so
called “rules officers” have done nothing about it.
WESPA’s equivalent rule (3.9.1) is much
better. The resulting festering problem is the tendency of some players to
disobey the vague rule by exposing the tiles inside the bag to their eyes. It
is naive to assume that such players are not seeking an undeserved advantage.
It is not enough for a player to flatly deny wrong doing when lowering the bag,
they should also obey rules in order to prove their claimed honesty beyond
doubt.
There are ways to
address this problem. Ideally, the bag should be held vertically such that the
rim is always above eye level. If a player is physically unable to lift the bag
up in such specified position, they should get the approval of their opponent
to lay the bag on the table such that the opening of the bag would be facing away
from them, in such a manner that does not expose the tiles inside the bag.
Looking away from the bag is not sufficient, let alone being difficult to
enforce.
I have also touched on the stillborn
five-second rule (rule 10. 2. a). I wonder how many players are aware of its
very existence, let alone apply it.
Now, I am going to explain why counting the
score should be done outside play time. Some might argue about the suggested
extra push of a button that might presumably lengthen the total time
of a game. My reply is: Put the suggested method to a trial test and compare. I
believe many players would be more inclined to see the merit of a method that
ensures scoring accuracy. An added important benefit is the relaxed atmosphere
created by eliminating the need to count the score in a hurry.
Under the current rule (rule 6.1), a player
would count the score of his play in his own time. He* would calculate the score, declare it and
operate his opponent’s clock. The poor opponent, baffled by the addition of the
score of four or five newly created words, might quickly accept the declared
score in order to save time, or if he had doubts about the accuracy of the
declared figure, would go over the counting again in a hurry, in his own time.
I am suggesting modifying this rule for the sake of accuracy and fairness.
Under the present rules, many addition errors could pass undetected. The
suggested change to the rules is simple:
To end his turn, a player would push the stop
button (“neutralise” the clock), without wasting any time on hasty calculation.
The two players would then both calculate the score and agree on an undisputed
final figure to be entered simultaneously on their score sheets, together with
the agreed cumulative score . Having finished with this, the player would start
his opponent’s clock. Both players would then proceed with the game in a
markedly relaxed manner. Challenges would be settled during this out-of-play time.
This method would result in accurate scoring.
It would eliminate any scoring disputes, especially those latent claimed errors that
crop up after many moves. This suggested method would also eliminate the need
to recalculate the scores of very close games.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Even though I am not a misogynist, as
once informed by the lady from the Volga , I really don’t like the phrase
“he/she”. Use of the masculine gender to mean both genders has always been
accepted until the onset of feminist linguistic mania.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P.S.:
The suggested clock usage
method has been successfully trialled at the Greensborough Club , Victoria .
One seasoned club player (DH) was particularly satisfied with the new method. She
only used clocks in six tournaments between 2007 and 2015. Therefore, the
comparison is worthwhile, since she is not “conditioned” to the old method.
I will continue trialling
the new method with more tournament players until many more opinion results are
obtained. Ideally, the suggested method should be trialled in some tournaments
on a national level, followed by a questionnaire, in order to obtain statistically
significant opinion results. That is of course if “rules officers” would take
their job seriously.
Wednesday, September 30, 2015
ANNOUNCEMENT FROM DAVID MORE
LABRADOR SCRABBLE CLUB
INVITES YOU
TO OUR COMPETITION ON
SUNDAY 11th OCTOBER 2015
GOOD
PRIZES:- 1ST PRIZE $100.00
(FOR EACH DIVISION) 2ND PRIZE $50.00
3RD PRIZE
$25.00
High Game $20.00
High Word $20.00
TWO OR THREE
DIVISIONS DEPENDING ON NUMBERS
START
TIME: 9:00 AM
ENTRY
FEE: $15:00
VENUE: Labrador Senior Citizens Centre
370 Marine
Parade, Labrador
(Entry from Broad
Street )
REGISTRATION: Ends 8:00 pm Saturday 10th October 2015
Please register early, maximum
60 players
David: (07) 5531 1767
Martin: martinw_512@hotmail.com
Emergency
on the day: 0415 572 017
Public
Transport: 704 Bus from Helensvale to Grand Hotel.
Driving from Brisbane : Exit 62 (Helensvale South).
Please bring
your boards and clocks.
N.B.: NO
AIRCONDITIONING, CEILING FANS ONLY
INVITES YOU
TO OUR COMPETITION ON
SUNDAY 11th OCTOBER 2015
GOOD
PRIZES:- 1ST PRIZE $100.00
(FOR EACH DIVISION) 2ND PRIZE $50.00
3RD PRIZE
$25.00
High Game $20.00
High Word $20.00
TWO OR THREE
DIVISIONS DEPENDING ON NUMBERS
START
TIME: 9:00 AM
ENTRY
FEE: $15:00
VENUE: Labrador Senior Citizens Centre
370 Marine
Parade, Labrador
(Entry from Broad
Street )
REGISTRATION: Ends 8:00 pm Saturday 10th October 2015
Please register early, maximum
60 players
David: (07) 5531 1767
Martin: martinw_512@hotmail.com
Emergency
on the day: 0415 572 017
Public
Transport: 704 Bus from Helensvale to Grand Hotel.
Driving from Brisbane : Exit 62 (Helensvale South).
Please bring
your boards and clocks.
N.B.: NO
AIRCONDITIONING, CEILING FANS ONLY
Wednesday, September 23, 2015
TOURNAMENT SCRABBLE RULES MADE SIMPLE
RULES MADE SIMPLE FOR
DUMMIES
a) Bag handling (Rule 5.1).The poor wording of this rule states, “You must hold the tile bag above the level of the table and so that no tiles in the bag can be seen”. Nonetheless, the poor wording still automatically puts the closed rim of the vertical bag above eye level, unless you were a giant or tables were extremely low. If a player has any medical problem, they should discuss an alternative method with the TD. This task should not be left to players. Otherwise, unpleasant scenes are likely to develop in the case of persistent habitual offenders. The ultimate aim of this rule is to keep the tiles inside the bag unexposed. Averting eyes from exposed tiles is a cosmetic measure. It is not an effective solution.
examine the correct positioning of the red bag
(b) Tile handling (Rule 5.2)
The rule states, “ You must show an empty hand both before drawing tiles, and after you have placed the drawn tiles onto the rack or table. You may not put your hand back into the tile bag whilst you still have tiles in that hand. All drawn tiles must be placed on the rack or the table before drawing any more.” This means an open palm must be shown before and after drawing tiles. Tiles drawn must be placed on the rack or table before proceeding to draw any more tiles. Some players tend to keep tiles in one hand and proceed to get more tiles with the other. This is forbidden by the rule.
Both players must walk together to the checking station. This rule can be
varied only if warranted by health reasons or maybe by mutual agreement, but
certainly not casually by certain Victorian players who make you wonder why you always tend
to be running out of time when you play them at your usual pace.
Adherence to the above
rules makes tournament play more pleasant. It takes the doubt out of the game. I
would like to enjoy every tournament game the same way I enjoy being beaten by skillful
honest players, rather than win a game against habitual rules’ offenders.
Monday, September 21, 2015
UNPAID AD
The announcement below
appeared on the Tournament Calendar on 19 Sept 2015. Please contact David or
Martin if you intend to play. Both would appreciate your early advice as it
helps with proper organisation. Martin puts much effort in the preparation of the
draws. Late entries would be very upsetting. So, don’t expect to be able to
play if you just drop in on the day without prior notice, at least one day
before the tournament. The pleasant venue accommodates a maximum of 60 players.
2015 TOURNAMENT CALENDAR
Qld
|
Sun Oct 11
|
370 Marine Pde |
David More
|
(07) 5531 1767
martinw_512@hotmail.com On the day: 0415 572 017 |
The above announcement replaces
the announcement below, which appeared on the Tournament Calendar for several
months before. We apologise for any inconvenience:
2015 TOURNAMENT CALENDAR
Qld
|
Sun
Oct 11 |
October Fundraiser
|
TBA
|
Olga Visser
|
(07) 3801
1362
visser@optushome.com.au On the day: 0401 884 511 |
Friday, September 11, 2015
HAPPY NEW YEAR

Dear Scrabble players ex Cape Town ,
As
we approach Rosh Hashanah (which begins at sundown on Sunday, September 13th),
we are reminded that we should love our foes on the other side of
the fence.
Thursday, August 6, 2015
ABOUT SCRABBLE RULES
On Aug 5, 2015 Mohammed Hegazi wrote:
Hello John,
I am responding to
your request about WESPA rules. They are relevant to me because our rules
officers copy them.
(1) 3.10.5 Holds and
3.10.6 Courtesy Draws
When a player puts his
played tiles on the board, declares his score and operates his opponent’s
clock, he should have no exceptional rights, claims or privileges whatsoever.
The time ticking is his opponent’s. He should refrain from replenishing his rack
until his play is accepted. The time ticking is not his. Therefore, he should
have no claims during that time. His opponent has the right to continue to
contemplate challenging for any length of time. It is the opponent’s own time
being wasted. The opponent might even tile track before making a challenge. It
is his time being wasted. Tiles drawn prematurely should be treated as excess
overdrawn tiles, if the opponent mounts a successful challenge.
If people would like
to simplify rules, I believe WESPA rules 3.10.5 and 3.10.6 can be deleted
without any further ado.
Too many unnecessary
rules are not a good thing.
(2) Ending the game
I believe this part of
the rules is utter nonsense. Neutralising the clock on going out is wrong, since
the game is not finished because the player at the receiving end still has the
option of challenging the last play of the opponent. Therefore, it would
be more sensible if the player going out would operate his/her
opponent's clock, as usual, after declaring the score and the notion of going
out. The opponent would then neutralise the clock in his own time and either
challenge or declare the end of the game. If the challenge is successful, the
challenged player takes his/her tiles off the board and the game continues. This
last scenario emphasises the notion that GOING OUT IS NOT THE END OF THE
GAME. THUS THE CLOCK SHOULD NOT BE NEUTRALISED ON GOING OUT. The player at the
receiving end might be able to successfully challenge, then hook a bingo and
win the game! So, going out is not necessarily the end of the game as initially
thought by rules engineers. It is a virtue to admit being wrong and to correct
the initial rule error, instead of correcting a mistake with another mistake.
I hope I am not being
too critical.
Thank you John,
Mohammed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Aug 6, 2015 John Hamilton wrote:
Hi Mohammed,
Thanks for your input. I appreciate that
simplified rules are desirable but the primary function of the rules is to
create a set of guidelines that provide an even contest. It is important to do
this as simply as possible but I don't agree with the notion of "
Regarding the holding/drawing tiles rule;
The majority of the Scrabble playing committee
disagrees with your belief that "he should have no exceptional rights,
claims or privileges" and that "The
time ticking is his opponents." When my opponent is considering their
move, I have a right to be considering my (potential) options with a full rack.
My opponent has the same rights on my time. I know you fundamentally disagree
with this but this view is held by the vast majority of players and something
that is not going to change anytime soon.
The hold rule is there to allow someone a
little bit of leeway when they are considering whether or not they want to
challenge. This is especially true with 5 point challenge but also relevant for
single challenge e.g. my opponents phoney word may give me a place to play a
triple triple.
As for your second point, I'm on the fence. I
both agree and disagree. I've submitted your idea to the committee and will get
back to you after it's been discussed
JohnH
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Aug 6, 2015 Mohammed Hegazi wrote:
Well John, bad rules are
either stillborn or awaiting their natural death in due course.
Saturday, August 1, 2015
COUNTING THE MINUTES
People might have
different ideas about how long a scrabble game should take. But once a figure satisfactory
for the majority of players has been reached, everybody should abide by it. That
figure is 25 minutes per player per game.
As expected, the one sensible
group I know of, that abides by this simple logic, is ASPA (SA). Deviants postulate
all sorts of unreasonable arguments to justify their unwarranted deviation from
the norm.
One common argument is the
desire to accommodate one extra game. Therefore, it becomes necessary to reduce
the figure from 25 to 22 minutes. Well, why don’t you shorten the lunch break,
instead of tampering with commonly accepted rules?
It is the same mentality
that invented the stillborn ridiculous “five second” and “hold” rules, but that
is another story.
Thursday, July 23, 2015
ASPA (ACT)
Another change of
leadership took place in Canberra .
John Hamilton voluntarily stepped aside in order to clear the way for a fresh
candidate.
John is a young levelheaded
person. He took the right decision at
the right time, when he could get a deserved heartfelt thank you for his effort.
If John had elected to continue for another year, he would have continued
unopposed.
I wish all ASPA committees
would follow this wise example. Unluckily, this is not the case with a few. In
one case, they had to be dragged into courts in order to have their
incompetence exposed. Even then, they would not voluntarily step down in order
to clear the way for others. They would rather continue to play musical chairs
for many more years or decades. The president may become secretary, then would evolve
as ordinary member, while the secretary may become president and the vice would
wait for a turn as president. Thus, the main four committee members behind the
demise of that particular association may continue to drag it down, assisted by
their friends. Would any one of this gang of four refrain from nomination next
November? NOH…NAH, even NUH for a challenge. Many other members want a role in
the salvation process, while many more are shying away from participating in
what might be misconstrued as an unwarranted power struggle.
Thursday, July 16, 2015
EXPIRY DATES
One of ASPA’s state committees have already held their
Annual General Meeting of 2015. Below is an excerpt from the President’s
Report:
“The Committee
has also been looking at succession planning and "X" has indicated that she
would be willing to take over the role of President in the future once she has
retired (from her bread-and-butter job). By that time I will be happy to relinquish my role as president as it
is important for a change of leadership.”
The above statement, by a
competent relatively young president, emphasises the importance of voluntary
devolution of power. Such commendable action is necessary for the introduction
of new ideas and renewal of energy. It wards off stagnation, especially if
the age of the incumbent is past their ability to be useful or innovative.
Compare this to some other
states, where the presidents cling to their presumed power for extended terms. When
some of them sense the possibility of another younger person coming forward,
they go out of their way seeking another extension of their stay. Instead of paving the
way for another fresh candidate, they feign illness to milk sympathy from the
membership, while soliciting proxy votes.
When will some people
realise that all humans have their brains stamped with a date seal stating their “best before” date?
Thursday, July 2, 2015
THE SOLUTION: NEW REFINED SCRABBLE ASSOCIATION
We all invested many
years playing Scrabble. We put up with much commercial exploitation in the form
of periodic additions and deletions to approved vocabulary. Vocabulary itself
deteriorated with the addition of foreign words, abbreviations, acronyms and
colloquial nonsense.
The last straw was the
introduction of a new three-year dictionary change cycle, instead of the
five-year cycle, which we unwillingly tolerated. It is obvious that the change is
commercially motivated.
The solution is
simple. We need to register a new incorporated association, something like “Proper
English Scrabble Association Inc.”. All we need is a minimum of six founding
members, to be picked from among players who are sick of the current state of
affairs. I can look after the registration process.
The aim is to adopt a
new dictionary, to be permanent for at least 5 or 10 years. An initial idea is
to adopt a scrabble form of the Oxford or Cambridge dictionaries.
We need to produce our
own adjudication programme for quick checking purposes. For this reason, we
require at least one enthusiastic member with the required technological skill.
We also need to examine and avoid copyright issues.
Should you be
interested please email me, as an initial contact. Your identity would remain
confidential, if you wish:
If the idea appeals to
sufficient numbers, we would have our initial general meeting shortly after. We
can then say goodbye to incompetence.
Thursday, June 25, 2015
OLGA FROM THE VOLGA
Strong rumours are
spreading fast within the QLD scrabble community and elsewhere. There are
claims that a very stubborn strain of the flu virus is being dispensed from a
health food store in Brisbane .
The new flu has been nicknamed “Olga from the Volga ”.
It is thought that the viral infection is also reinforced by bacterial support.
If these claims are
correct, and I tend to believe they are, I would strongly recommend what my family
doctor prescribed for me, after a two-week suffering period:
Aspen Pharma's "Moxiclav Duo Forte 875/125",
(or Sandoz equivalent: "Curam Duo Forte 875mg/125mg").
It is a combination of amoxycillin and clavulanic acid.
(or Sandoz equivalent: "Curam Duo Forte 875mg/125mg").
It is a combination of amoxycillin and clavulanic acid.
This is a course of a
strong antibiotic in the form of ten tablets to be taken twice a day for 5
days, followed by another precautionary repeat of the same course.
I am half-way through the first course. The initial improvement is very promising.
So, please take the matter seriously, if you happen to cop the dangerous "Olga from the Volga", or came too close to its principal distributer during a scrabble tournament.
So, please take the matter seriously, if you happen to cop the dangerous "Olga from the Volga", or came too close to its principal distributer during a scrabble tournament.
Tuesday, June 23, 2015
THE SCRABBLE ASYLUM, Far North
David More is an enigmatic simple pleasant person, if you don’t rub him the wrong way. He shares a two bedroom
apartment with a cat. There is no love lost between me and the cat, but that doesn’t
prevent David from insisting on having me as his guest, rather than let me stay
in a nearby motel.
David organised a pleasant and quite successful tournament at Labrador on 26/04/2015, which I attended. It attracted 56
players, which was a record attendance for a non-major event, unmatched in QLD
for a very long time. Check the list of 2014 tournament attendance below.
Encouraged by the surprising success of his tournament, David thought of
organising another Labrador tournament later
in 2015, in order to help the committee of ASPA (QLD) boost their overall attendance for 2015. When he applied for approval by the grudging committee, he was told
that there was no room for another tournament in 2015, because QLD can only run a maximum of one tournament a
fortnight, even though past track record of several of those tournaments shows attendance of only half a dozen players.
My question to the sages
who took the strange decision is: Why not change one of the dubious fund raisers on the
Calendar to another Labrador tournament, and
collect the larger proceeds as funds raised? Look at the Calendar below and see for
yourself how those fund raisers, concocted in a hurry, are still lacking
organisation and suitable venues:
QLD 2014 TOURNAMENT ATTENDANCE
TOURNAMENT ATTENDANCE
QLD 12.01.2014 Logan Clovers 46
QLD 01.02.2014
Townsville Feb 6
QLD 08.02.2014
Alzheimer's FR Saturday 28
QLD 09.02.2014
Alzheimer's FR Sunday 36
QLD 23.02.2014 Feb
Frolic 17
QLD 08.03.2014 Redland Bay 50
QLD 23.03.2014 XYSTI 12
QLD 05.04.2014
Bremer Waters 26
QLD 17.05.2014
Matchplay 34
QLD 03.06.2014
Autumnal RRs 6
QLD 08.06.2014
Woomba Wound Wobins 22
QLD 22.06.2014 Southport Winter 52
QLD 28.06.2014 TSV
EOFY SAT 6
QLD 29.06.2014 TSV
EOFY SUN 6
QLD 06.07.2014
Coominya 52
QLD 08.07.2014 JULY
RR RUNCORN 10
QLD 03.08.2014 WYSC
Fundraiser 34
QLD 09.08.2014
Townsville Saturday 13
QLD 10.08.2014
Townsville Sunday 12
QLD 31.08.2014 Queensland Championships 46
QLD 21.09.2014
Toowoomba 26
QLD 05.10.2014 Trans
Tasman Fundraiser 22
QLD 25.10.2014
Redcliffe Saturday 48
QLD 26.10.2014
Redcliffe Sunday 46
QLD 30.11.2014 Southport 48
QLD 30.11.2014 TVL
November 6
QLD 27.12.2014 Last
Chance 30
____________________________________________
TOTAL ATTENDANCE 670
2015 TOURNAMENT CALENDAR
State
|
Date
|
Tournament & conditions
|
Venue
|
Contact
|
Phone & e-mail
|
Qld
|
Sun
Jun 14 |
Palmwoods
|
Palmwoods Hotel
|
Wayne Willis
|
041 557 2017
kippa1955@bigpond.com |
Qld
|
Sun
Jun 28 |
Cnr Scarborough/Lawson Sts |
Sandra Woolard
|
swoolard@bigpond.net.au
0418 610 414 |
|
Qld
|
Sat Jul 4
10:50 for 11 am start |
Townsville
at least 5 games |
'The Dalgety'
106 Denham St |
Julie Brice
Helen Hynes |
juliebrice@bigpond.com
scrabbledhel@yahoo.com.au On the day: 0409 748 323 |
Qld
|
Tue
July 7 |
Wintering
|
Queen Alexandra Home
Coorparoo |
Martin Waterworth
|
(07) 3357 3308
martinw_512@hotmail.com On the day: 0438 457 566 |
Qld
|
Sun
Jul 12 |
Tangara
|
West |
Roberta Tait
|
0431 640 874
taitroberta@hotmail.com |
Qld
|
Saturday
Jul 18 |
July Jaunt
MAX 18 players |
Runcorn
|
Karen Richards
|
(07) 3151 0495
karendrichards@gmail.com |
Qld
|
Sunday
July 26 |
Coominya
|
Lowood Showground Hall
|
Matthew Forno
|
0417 446 556
matthewforno@hotmail.com |
Qld
|
Sun Aug 16
|
August Fundraiser
|
TBA
|
Olga Visser
|
(07) 3801 1362
visser@optushome.com.au On the day: 0401 884 511 |
Qld
|
Sat/Sun
Aug 29/30 |
Queensland Championships & One-day
Sunday
|
Kedron Wavell Services Club
Chermside |
Wayne Willis
|
041 557 2017
kippa1955@bigpond.com |
Qld
|
Sun Sep 13
|
Toowoomba
|
Elworthy St |
Jane Brown
|
jb.edits@bigpond.net.au
(07) 4635 5013 On the day: 0448 789 129 |
Qld
|
Wed
Sep 16 |
FoSsiLs F2F
|
Runcorn
|
Karen Richards
|
(07) 3151 0495
karendrichards@gmail.com |
Qld
|
Sun
Sep 27 |
September Fundraiser
|
TBA
|
Olga Visser
|
(07) 3801 1362
visser@optushome.com.au On the day: 0401 884 511 |
Qld
|
Sun
Oct 11 |
October Fundraiser
|
TBA
|
Olga Visser
|
(07) 3801 1362
visser@optushome.com.au On the day: 0401 884 511 |
Qld
|
Sun
Oct 25 |
Redcliffe
Max 52 players |
Redcliffe Bridge Club Rooms
2A |
Wayne Willis
|
041 557 2017
kippa1955@bigpond.com |
Qld
|
Sun
Nov 15 |
November Fundraiser
|
TBA
|
Olga Visser
|
(07) 3801 1362
visser@optushome.com.au On the day: 0401 884 511 |
Qld
|
Sun
Nov 29 |
Cnr Scarborough/Lawson Sts |
Sandra Woolard
|
swoolard@bigpond.net.au
0418 610 414 |
|
Qld
|
Sun
Dec 13 |
December Fundraiser
|
TBA
|
Olga Visser
|
(07) 3801 1362
visser@optushome.com.au On the day: 0401 884 511 |
Qld
|
Sun Dec 27
|
Last Chance
|
Queen Alexandra Home
Coorparoo |
Olga Visser
|
(07) 3801 1362
visser@optushome.com.au On the day: 0401 884 511 |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




